OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) - Elon Musk’s lawyers took on with OpenAI in court Tuesday as a federal judge weighed the billionaire’s request for a court order that would obstruct the ChatGPT maker from converting itself to a for-profit company.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said it was a “stretch” for Musk to claim he will be irreparably damaged if she does not intervene to stop OpenAI from moving forward with its transition from a not-for-profit lab to a for-profit corporation.

But the judge likewise raised issues about OpenAI and oke.zone its relationship with business partner Microsoft and said she wouldn’t stop the case from relocating to trial as soon as next year so a jury can decide.

“It is plausible that what Mr. Musk is saying holds true. We ´ ll discover out. He ´ ll rest on the stand,” she said.

Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, took legal action against the artificial intelligence company in 2015, first in a state court and wiki.rolandradio.net later in federal court, gratisafhalen.be declaring it had actually betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the general public great. Musk had actually invested about $45 million in the startup from its founding until 2018, his legal representative said Tuesday.

Musk escalated the legal conflict late in 2015, including brand-new claims and defendants and asking for videochatforum.ro a court order that would stop OpenAI ´ s prepares to convert itself into a for-profit organization more completely. Musk also added his own AI company, xAI, as a plaintiff.

Also targeted by Musk’s claim is OpenAI’s close organization partner Microsoft and tech business owner Reid Hoffman, a previous OpenAI board member who also sits on Microsoft’s board.

Gonzalez Rogers said she has a high bar for authorizing the type of initial injunction that Musk desires but hasn’t yet ruled on the demand. She did say she had “significant concerns” with 2 people linked to Microsoft on OpenAI’s board - Hoffman and longtime Microsoft executive Deanna Templeton, who was a “non-voting observer.”

“So you want me to believe that she was sitting there listening to all the discussions and not telling anybody? What would the point be for her to sit there and listen to everyone, if not to interact what she was listening? There would be no point for her to be there, which is why she really should not exist,” she said.

Hoffman, a co-founder of LinkedIn, has actually been on Microsoft ´ s board considering that soon after the tech huge bought the task networking site. He stepped down from OpenAI’s board in 2023 to prevent disputes with his AI startup, Inflection.

Templeton, octomo.co.uk who Musk likewise called as a defendant, was added as a non-voting member of OpenAI ´ s board in the aftermath of Altman ´ s ouster after Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sought more stability on the board. But months later on, she was dropped from the OpenAI board as U.S. antitrust enforcers were revealing concerns about such plans on corporate boards.

The judge has actually handled a variety of tech industry cases consisting of Apple’s fight with Epic Games, though she said Tuesday that Musk’s case is “absolutely nothing like” that a person. That case was likewise the last time she gave a preliminary injunction, in 2020, eight months before the case went to trial.

Then-President Barack Obama appointed Gonzalez Rogers to the federal bench in 2011.

Tuesday’s hearing was originally set for January but was held off after Musk’s lawyer Marc Toberoff said his house was ruined in the Pacific Palisades wildfire.

Musk, who did not go to the hearing, has declared in the claim that the companies are violating the terms of his fundamental contributions to the charity. Judge Gonzalez Rogers called it a “stretch” to claim “permanent damage” to Musk, and called the case “billionaires vs. billionaires.” She questioned why Musk invested tens of millions in OpenAI without a written contract. Toberoff said it was because the relationship between Altman and Musk at the time was “developed on trust” and the 2 were extremely close.

“That is just a lot of money” to invest “on a handshake,” the judge said.

OpenAI has said Musk ´ s requested court order would “debilitate OpenAI ´ s company”and objective to the benefit of Musk and his own AI business and is based upon “far-fetched” legal claims.

At the heart of the dispute is a 2017 internal power struggle at the recently established startup that resulted in Altman ending up being OpenAI ´ s CEO

. Emails revealed by OpenAI show Musk had actually likewise looked for to be CEO and grew frustrated after 2 other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a significant investor and president if the start-up prospered in its goal to attain better-than-human AI referred to as synthetic basic intelligence, or AGI. Musk has actually long voiced concerns about how sophisticated forms of AI might threaten humankind.

Altman eventually prospered in ending up being CEO and has actually remained so other than for a duration in 2023 when he was fired and after that renewed days later on after the board that ousted him was changed.

OpenAI has actually sought to demonstrate Musk ´ s early support for the idea of making OpenAI a for-profit business so it might raise cash for the hardware and classifieds.ocala-news.com computer power that AI needs.

Musk is not the only one difficult OpenAI’s for-profit shift. Facebook and oke.zone Instagram moms and dad Meta Platforms has asked California’s attorney general to obstruct it, and the workplace of Delaware’s attorney general of the United States has said it is examining the conversion.

It was not clear Tuesday when the case may go to trial. Musk’s lawyers at first said they would be ready by June after some back-and-forth with the 2 sides the judge suggested it probably won’t be up until June 2026 at the earliest, but likely early 2027.

O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

-------