U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for severe conversation of American diplomacy and international affairs. The publication has featured contributions from numerous leading global affairs experts.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint authorizations here.




In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with an important intelligence difficulty in its blossoming competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from World War II might no longer provide sufficient intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. monitoring abilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union’s closed airspace. This deficiency stimulated an audacious moonshot initiative: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were delivering important intelligence, capturing pictures of Soviet rocket setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar point. Competition between Washington and its rivals over the future of the international order is intensifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should take benefit of its world-class economic sector and adequate capacity for development to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence community should harness the nation’s sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed of today’s world. The integration of artificial intelligence, particularly through large language designs, provides groundbreaking opportunities to improve intelligence operations and analysis, making it possible for the delivery of faster and more appropriate assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation comes with considerable downsides, nevertheless, particularly as foes make use of similar advancements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to safeguard itself from opponents who might use the innovation for ill, and initially to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security community, fulfilling the promise and managing the peril of AI will require deep technological and cultural changes and a willingness to change the method firms work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the capacity of AI while mitigating its inherent risks, making sure that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a quickly evolving international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently communicate to the American public, and to populations and partners around the world, how the country plans to fairly and securely use AI, in compliance with its laws and values.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI’s capacity to change the intelligence neighborhood lies in its ability to process and evaluate vast amounts of information at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate big quantities of collected information to generate time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services might take advantage of AI systems’ pattern recognition abilities to determine and alert human analysts to potential hazards, such as missile launches or military movements, or essential global developments that experts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers have an interest in. This ability would make sure that crucial warnings are prompt, actionable, and appropriate, enabling more efficient responses to both rapidly emerging dangers and emerging policy chances. Multimodal models, which incorporate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For instance, using AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence might offer a detailed view of military motions, allowing quicker and more accurate hazard evaluations and potentially new methods of delivering details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise unload recurring and time-consuming tasks to makers to concentrate on the most satisfying work: generating initial and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood’s overall insights and productivity. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence companies invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The abilities of language models have grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI’s recently launched o1 and o3 designs showed significant progress in precision and reasoning ability-and can be used to even more rapidly translate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although challenges remain, future systems trained on greater amounts of non-English data could be efficient in discerning subtle differences between dialects and understanding the meaning and cultural context of slang or . By counting on these tools, the intelligence community might focus on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be tough to find, typically battle to survive the clearance process, and take a long time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language products available throughout the best firms, U.S. intelligence services would be able to faster triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to choose the needles in the haystack that really matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be underestimated. Models can promptly sort through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then validate and fine-tune, making sure the end products are both detailed and precise. Analysts could coordinate with a sophisticated AI assistant to resolve analytical problems, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative fashion, improving each version of their analyses and providing finished intelligence faster.

Consider Israel’s experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran’s nuclear activities between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of files and an additional 55,000 files kept on CDs, consisting of pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities positioned tremendous pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed assessments of its content and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts a number of months-and numerous hours of labor-to translate each page, review it by hand for appropriate material, and include that details into assessments. With today’s AI abilities, the very first two steps in that process could have been accomplished within days, maybe even hours, enabling experts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

Among the most interesting applications is the method AI might change how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to engage straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would enable users to ask particular questions and receive summed up, relevant details from thousands of reports with source citations, assisting them make notified decisions rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI provides many advantages, it also postures substantial brand-new risks, particularly as foes establish comparable innovations. China’s developments in AI, especially in computer system vision and security, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit makes it possible for massive information collection practices that have yielded data sets of tremendous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on huge quantities of individual and behavioral information that can then be used for various functions, such as security and social control. The presence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software all over the world could offer China with ready access to bulk data, significantly bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition designs, a particular issue in nations with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood must consider how Chinese models built on such extensive information sets can provide China a strategic benefit.

And it is not just China. The expansion of “open source” AI models, such as Meta’s Llama and those created by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI abilities into the hands of users across the world at fairly cost effective expenses. Many of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and [forum.batman.gainedge.org](https://forum.batman.gainedge.org/index.php?action=profile