Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states “Chiefs vs Eagles? … How Predictable”

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a little however lively 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to answer mankind’s most difficult concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less simple to pin down. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing improvements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months ago so we have actually built an “agentic pipeline” to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified area to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now … The Important Questions

We posed the following concerns to our AI and determined its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these quotes for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis’ relationship is rock strong, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal …

First, I’ll take a look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He’s a big football star, and she’s been encouraging of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr and Taylor has actually even welcomed her friends and household to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not resolving the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he’s plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the odds and his responses suggest it’s more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I ’d estimate a low probability, perhaps around 5%, thinking about all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 “tush-pushes” throughout the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn’t stopped the Eagles from using their signature “tush-push” move, now its simply a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a “tush-push” is? Does an AI even know what a “tush” is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen’s similar attempts? Appears like our AI thinks they’ll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I’m trying to determine the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 “tush-pushes” during the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand what exactly a “tush-push” is. From the posts, it appears like it’s a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It’s compared to pressing a heavy box, so it’s a physical maneuver that requires strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the “tush-push.” It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. … I also need to think of the defensive strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand addsub.wiki the Eagles’ “tush-push” technique, they might adjust their defense accordingly, which could either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 looks like a significant number but possible offered their self-confidence, I would approximate a probability around 60-70% chance. This represents their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the likelihood that they’ll use it several times, specifically if it’s reliable early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn’t going to back down from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He’s done this in his songs, like “The Heart Part 4,” and even made a statement during a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems considerable due to the fact that it reveals he’s done it previously, so perhaps he’ll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he’s less most likely to attend to Trump this time.

However, he’s likewise involved in a fight with Drake, which might give him reasons to make some public statements, even if they’re not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track “Not Like Us.” There’s a character assassination fit from Drake, so possibly he bewares about including any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still desire to perform it, even if it’s uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar may feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements during the halftime show, so there’s a threat that such material may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong proceed huge stages. He’s the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits recommends he’s not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he’s less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he’s focusing on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion’s context-the probability seems to be reasonably high, possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% chance

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn’t? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn’t suggest to trigger offense which he actually discovered it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might show he’s the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There’s an article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he’s a person who enjoys eating, specifically with his group. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it’s possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

“Tails never fails?” You can’t fool the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can’t be deceived and believes anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I’m attempting to figure out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there’s some historical information that may influence this forecast.

First, I read through the short articles provided. They all mention the historical statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has shown up regularly than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, however it’s not a huge difference.

However, I remember that the result of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historical data even if it’s not statistically significant. So, I ought to think about whether this historic bias needs to influence the probability.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historical information reveals a minor choice for tails, it’s not statistically substantial enough to move the probability away from 0.5. So, I’ll opt for 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists however doesn’t bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn’t born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn’t inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely think the same. BUT, its official now since our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm … 1% is still type of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I’m attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that’s a pretty severe accusation. Let me break this down. First, I’m seeing a lot of posts that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable contact recent video games, specifically the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as “preposterous” and “ludicrous.” They say there’s no proof of methodical bias. That’s a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they’re denying it, it might mean there’s no genuine basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise mentioned that analytical analysis doesn’t show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have actually been punished more given that 2022. That’s intriguing because if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect less charges, right?

…

So, putting all of it together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely . Maybe not zero since you can’t dismiss every possibility, however incredibly not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth watching the video game still? I guess I’ll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about everything, at least it can gain from this.