OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) - Elon Musk’s attorneys took on with OpenAI in court Tuesday as a federal judge weighed the billionaire’s demand for chessdatabase.science a court order that would block the ChatGPT maker from transforming itself to a for-profit business.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said it was a “stretch” for Musk to claim he will be irreparably hurt if she does not intervene to stop OpenAI from moving on with its transition from a not-for-profit research lab to a for-profit corporation.

But the judge likewise raised issues about OpenAI and canadasimple.com its relationship with company partner Microsoft and said she would not stop the case from relocating to trial as quickly as next year so a jury can choose.

“It is possible that what Mr. Musk is saying is true. We ´ ll find out. He ´ ll sit on the stand,” she said.

Musk, an early OpenAI financier and board member, biolink.palcurr.com took legal action against the synthetic intelligence business in 2015, initially in a California state court and later in federal court, alleging it had betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research the general public excellent. Musk had invested about $45 million in the start-up from its founding until 2018, his legal representative said Tuesday.

Musk escalated the legal disagreement late last year, library.kemu.ac.ke adding new claims and offenders and requesting a court order that would stop OpenAI ´ s plans to convert itself into a for-profit company more totally. Musk also added his own AI business, xAI, as a plaintiff.

Also targeted by Musk’s claim is OpenAI’s close company partner Microsoft and tech entrepreneur Reid Hoffman, a former OpenAI board member who also sits on Microsoft’s board.

Gonzalez Rogers said she has a high bar for approving the sort of preliminary injunction that Musk desires however hasn’t yet ruled on the demand. She did say she had “considerable issues” with 2 people linked to Microsoft on OpenAI’s board - Hoffman and long time Microsoft executive Deanna Templeton, who was a “non-voting observer.”

“So you desire me to think that she was sitting there listening to all the discussions and not telling anybody? What would the point be for her to sit there and listen to everyone, if not to interact what she was listening? There would be no point for her to be there, which is why she actually should not be there,” she said.

Hoffman, a co-founder of LinkedIn, has actually been on Microsoft ´ s board considering that soon after the tech huge bought the task networking website. He stepped down from OpenAI’s board in 2023 to prevent conflicts with his AI startup, Inflection.

Templeton, who Musk likewise called as a defendant, was included as a non-voting member of OpenAI ´ s board in the aftermath of Altman ´ s ouster after Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sought more stability on the board. But months later on, she was dropped from the OpenAI board as U.S. antitrust enforcers were expressing issues about such arrangements on business boards.

The judge has dealt with a number of tech industry cases consisting of Apple’s fight with Epic Games, though she said Tuesday that Musk’s case is “nothing like” that a person. That case was likewise the last time she approved a preliminary injunction, in 2020, eight months before the case went to trial.

Then-President Barack Obama selected Gonzalez Rogers to the federal bench in 2011.

Tuesday’s hearing was originally set for January but was held off after Musk’s lawyer Marc Toberoff said his house was ruined in the Pacific Palisades wildfire.

Musk, who did not go to the hearing, has actually declared in the claim that the business are violating the terms of his foundational contributions to the charity. Judge Gonzalez Rogers called it a “stretch” to claim “permanent damage” to Musk, and called the case “billionaires vs. billionaires.” She questioned why Musk invested 10s of millions in OpenAI without a composed contract. Toberoff said it was because the relationship between Altman and Musk at the time was “developed on trust” and the 2 were really close.

“That is simply a lot of cash” to invest “on a handshake,” the judge said.

OpenAI has actually said Musk ´ s requested court order would “incapacitate OpenAI ´ s organization”and mission to the advantage of Musk and his own AI company and is based upon “far-fetched” legal claims.

At the heart of the conflict is a 2017 internal power struggle at the recently established startup that caused Altman becoming OpenAI ´ s CEO

. Emails revealed by OpenAI show Musk had actually likewise sought to be CEO and grew frustrated after two other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a significant shareholder and president if the startup prospered in its objective to attain better-than-human AI called artificial basic intelligence, hb9lc.org or AGI. Musk has actually long voiced issues about how sophisticated types of AI could threaten humanity.

Altman eventually was successful in ending up being CEO and has actually remained so except for a duration in 2023 when he was fired and then renewed days later after the board that ousted him was replaced.

OpenAI has looked for to demonstrate Musk ´ s early assistance for the idea of making OpenAI a for-profit company so it might raise money for the hardware and computer system power that AI needs.

Musk is not the only one challenging OpenAI’s for-profit shift. Facebook and Instagram moms and dad Meta Platforms has actually asked California’s lawyer general to block it, and honkaistarrail.wiki the office of Delaware’s attorney general has said it is examining the conversion.

It was unclear Tuesday when the case may go to trial. Musk’s legal representatives at first said they would be all set by June after some back-and-forth with the 2 sides the judge showed it most likely won’t be till June 2026 at the earliest, however likely early 2027.

O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

-------